The Pixie was designed by Ytai Ben-Tsvi, who joins us below with "how he did it"
Don't forget to read the whole thing for a bonus photo at the end!
Take it away, Ytai!
While having a fairly simple functionality, the Pixie design has more than meet the eye. In contrast to its low-power relatives, the NeoPixels, switching current to a chain of 3W LEDs creates some interesting engineering challenges, which took a few iterations to get right. Here’s what we’ve learned and how we’ve approached some of the interesting problems.
Fairly early down the design path, it became clear that implementing all the features we wanted is a task most suited for a small microcontroller. We chose the 8-bit Microchip PIC12F1571, which had just about everything we could hope for in this application. It is small and cheap, works on 5V, has exactly 5 I/O pins (used for R, G, B, Din, Dout), an internal oscillator, a 16-bit, 3 channel PWM module, on-die temperature sensor and more. Pretty amazing!
Programming the PIC12 is done through exposed pads featured on the circuit for that purpose (labeled rst/pgd/pgc). A cheap PIC programmer can be used, but the programming protocol is so simple that we’ve implemented an Arduino library that can do that for our testbed.
The possibilities with having an on-board microcontroller are endless! The Pixie can be reprogrammed for standalone operation, and the Din/Dout pins can be repurposed to support different protocols or to directly connect to buttons, etc. The Dout pin can even be used for analog input!
The exiting firmware can be found in Pixie's Github repository.
In order to provide a consistent level of illumination each of the R, G, B LEDs needs a constant current supply of about 350mA. We opted for linear regulation for its simplicity and low-cost, despite it being less efficient (and as such, dissipating more heat) than switching regulation.
The constant current circuit is pretty cool. Let’s explain it by first considering the path of the current through the LED. The current comes from the 5V supply, through the LED, then through a nFET (Q1/3/5) then through a 1.74[Ohm] shunt resistor. The more resistive the FET becomes between its drain and source, the smaller the current flowing through this path. Now let’s see how we can use this to our advantage.
The NPN transistors Q2/4/6 have a specified 0.6V drop between base and emitter when on. This means the voltage across their respective shunt resistors R1/3/5 will always be 0.6V. According to Ohm’s law, this means that the current through them will be 0.6[V]/1.74[Ohm], or about 344mA. Close enough. If the current were to decrease, the base voltage would decrease proportionally, resulting in the NPN having more resistance between its collector and emitter, thus causing a higher voltage on the collector (recognize the voltage divider formed between the NPNs and their R2/4/6 pull-ups?). But this would result in a higher voltage on the FET gate, causing it to become less resistive between source and drain and as a result, higher current through the LED. The same logic can be applied in the opposite direction. The conclusion is that this circuit is self-regulating the LED current.
Different colors are achieved via Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) on each of the R, G, B LED. The PIC has a built-in 3-channel, 16-bit PWM peripheral. This allows us to be fancy and do Gamma correction, which means we are doing a non-linear mapping of the 8-bit color value we are commanded with to a high resolution 16-bit color, resulting in a much more natural color gradient compared to a straight linear mapping. The PWM peripheral runs at about 500Hz. The generated signals switch the constant-current circuit described above.
Originally, we have designed the Pixie to support the same serial protocol as the WS28x family (aka NeoPixel). It worked. However, this compatibility, which was originally considered a feature has been eventually deemed a drawback: the WS28x protocol doesn’t easily lend itself to common micro controller peripherals, and in most cases ends up being bit-banged by the controller, requiring a relative high CPU usage, making it hard to do other timing-sensitive operations at the same time, not to mention driving another chain on a different pin… Our solution: stick to the good ol’ 115k.2 asynchronous serial. Almost every microcontroller has a UART peripheral capable of easily generating this protocol without much CPU intervention. Many have more than one. Even a PC with a simple USB-serial dongle can do that fairly easily. Seems like a win! The only drawback we could see what with the data rate being relatively low, we run into frame-rate / chain length limitations (about 60-long chain @ 50 frames/sec). However, at about 1[A] per Pixie, we concluded that typical chains would not be super-long.
The resulting serial protocol is very simple: the controllers sends a byte-string containing a color value for each LED in the chain as follows:
<R1>, <G1>, <B1>, <R2>, <G2>, <B2>, <R3>, <G3>, <B3>, …, <Rn>, <Gn>, <Bn>, <at least 1ms of silence>
<Xi> is a byte representing the brightness of a single color of a single Pixie, where 0 is off, 255 is fully on, and everything is between is, er, everything in between.
<R1>, <G1>, <B1> will determine the color of the Pixie that is the first in the chain, counting from the controller end.
<R2>, <G2>, <B2> is the next one, etc.
Each Pixie listens on it Din pin for serial data. It will consume the first 3 bytes it sees and store them. It will then echo any subsequent bytes to its Dout pin (with less than a microsecond latency). It will keep doing so until it detects a 1ms-long silence on Din. Then, it will immediately apply (latch) the color values it got and go back to listening for a new color. This yield a very effective mechanism for addressing LEDs individually and making sure they all latch at the same time.
Having a chain with multiple nodes constantly switching 1[A] loads is no small feat! Even an otherwise negligible wire resistance would result in noticeable voltage glitches. Not to mention wire inductance, which likes sudden current changes even less, and reacts with furious voltage surges unless dealt with. To make things worse, being a chain-oriented product, we’re expecting people to use rather long (several meters) wires, which inevitably have more resistance and inductance. And worse still, the on-chip temperature indicator that we really really wanted to use is extremely sensitive to the slightest of noise on the supply. Did we get your attention?
We took several measure to mitigate those issues. First, we made sure the holes for the supply wires are large enough to fit a 16AWG wire. Thicker wires = less resistive = good. The PCB traces connecting the input and output supply are super wide for the same reason.
Then, bulk capacitance! A large 22uF ceramic (hence, low ESR) capacitor across the supply on every node is used to absorb voltage transients, especially those caused by wire inductance. Then, that supply gets further filtered using an R/C circuit comprising R7, R9 and C1, the latter being yet another 22uF ceramic and the relatively high resistor values ensure that the C1 reacts very slowly to any change in the supply voltage. One thing to notice is that we’ve used to resistors and we let the capacitor “float” in the middle. Why? Assuming fairly equal wires for 5V and GND, this setup would result in the supply rails for all microcontrollers in the chain to always have the same Vcc/2 potential, even if their Vcc voltage is different as result of wire resistance x high current. This makes it easier to discern the 0’s from the 1’s between consecutive nodes and thus get a reliable communication channel despite the supply noise. Otherwise, since the detection threshold is relative to the supply rails, we would have smaller error margins.
That simple circuit took a lot of tweaking to get right, but the result is very satisfactory noise-immunity characteristics.
Despite LEDs being relatively efficient light sources, they still convert the vast majority of their consumed power into heat. Furthermore, our linear constant current circuit uses resistance (across the FET) to limit the current, resulting in the extra power being converted to heat. In total, at full steam (driving all 3 LEDs at 100% duty cycle) our little circuit dissipates around 5W! Keeping it from over-heating in this condition is unfeasible. We’ve allocated largish thermal places on the PCB to improve cooling efficiency, but really, the intention is to not leave the LED full-on for more than a couple of seconds. Rather, working continuously at lower brightness is perfectly fine as well as generating fast, bright pulses periodically.
But we wanted to make sure that the LEDs would not get dangerously hot even by accident. For that reason, the Pixie firmware uses the PIC’s on-chip temperature indicator to estimate the board’s temperature and would shut-down the LED when it gets too hot (above about 70 degrees celsius). It will automatically resume operation when it cools down. Getting this temperature indicator to work with reasonable precision was a challenge. First, the PIC’s supply voltage needed to be extra-clean (as described above) and second, to account for variability between different instances of the PIC, each and every unit goes through an automated calibration process during manufacturing and the temperature calibration data gets written to the PIC’s flash memory.
Have you ever noticed how NeoPixels retain their color if their controller goes away? While this can be considered a convenient feature in some cases, it is an absolute no-go in a 3W LED case. Losing communications with the controller for any reason during a high-brightness pulse, that was otherwise intended to be very short, could potentially result in LEDs being left on for extended periods, consuming a lot of power and dissipating a lot of heat (limited by the over-temperature feature described above). Even more, what if we have a firmware bug (not that we ever have bugs, but just for the sake of the discussion ;D) causing the PIC to hang while its LED is on? That would be unacceptable.
Watchdog to the rescue! Remember we told you how awesome the PIC12 is? Another feature that is useful for us is the watchdog. It will reset the PIC if it doesn’t hear from our firmware that everything is fine for about 2 seconds. In turn, our firmware will only pet the watchdog every time it gets a valid color and successfully latches it. So unless we hear from our controller at least every 2 seconds (and in practice, better leave a little margin), the Pixie resets, causing the LED to turn off until told otherwise.
So unlike NeoPixels, if you want your Pixies to stay on for extended periods, even with no color change, you need to constantly remind them that you’re alive by sending them their favorite string.
Who would have guessed that designing a circuit having only about 20 simple parts could get so complicated? Certainly not us! We have done our best to provide a high quality, useful product and learned a lot along the way. We’re hoping you’ll like the result and enjoyed reading about some of the reasoning behind it.